AI as a presumably Intelligent Artist
- Carlos G. Lázaro
- Mar 6
- 1 min read
This is just not to get a fully empty section, but I have heard a lot about this topic, and I want to share a bit fast my point of view of today (06/03/2026). I know it's very well shared and it's not unique, but I want to express it, because that's what makes me want to become an artist: expression.
In general, I'm not a big fan of AI. I believe it can have many applications but, especially for art, I don't find it interesting enough. It lacks of an intention, and it shows.
The other day I heard "AI can serve artists to help them get inspiration" and it got me thinking about it for hours. What do you mean by "helping to get inspiration" with AI? I consider an artist someone who has an idea to share and manages to find a way to share it. It can be through sound, through images, through a speech, a shape, a movement... Whatever, that's on the artist's need or skills to find out. If you have nothing to say and you just want to produce a product, then the whole thing is missing. There's no intention, there's no need to find a way to express, there's no art.
This has a lot more to develop, but thank you for reading if you got here. Don't forget to give me any (respectfully, please) feedback, and see you hopefully soon!

Comments